OurPatch

Mostly sunny
Local Weather
Mostly sunny
10.7°C

In the past I have written articles aimed at those who may be from the cities who are visiting or coming to live in rural areas. The aim has been to assist them in adjusting to rural life and to dispel some of the myths and preconceptions that still exist.

Perhaps one preconception is that all rural communities are in arid outback settings and in one-shop towns. However another is one that I am afraid some of our Western Australian politicians seem to think: that an outer suburb of Perth such as  Rockingham is in fact a rural community! Give me strength!!

When we hear politicians and others talking about our cities, we automatically think about the Capital cities scattered around our coasts. We forget about cities such as Canberra, Cairns, Tamworth, Bendigo, Bunbury, Albany and Orange. Do these cities have the same attention from those in power as Sydney, Brisbane or Perth? Or are they treated like rural backwaters (well perhaps not Canberra!)

 Well – what do you class as rural living? Does the classification still stand when we think of those cities mentioned or can we really only classify a rural community if a majority of their industries and the people’s livelihood depends on a primary industry for their survival?  If we are to take this view, we need to take in mining towns, farming towns, and fishing communities. But then where does the town that relies on tourism fit in? Think of Alice Springs and Hyden – farming towns that have developed a massive tourist industry. Would they exist even if the farmers or pastoralists left?

 I would like your thought about these definitions and what you think our politicians think about when they think “rural” or “country”.

While we are on the subject of politicians did you hear that our state treasurer refused to give the Flying Doctors Service a decent slice of the budget because he thought they were “just another interest group”? I hope he never gets stranded on a country road with someone he loves involved in an accident – no wait – he rarely leaves the city so that is not likely! Oh! And then our Federal friends have just cut Regional Development funding – and other schemes designed to keep young people in their communities with jobs when the drought has caused a downturn in prospects. Oh, haven’t you heard – it rained in some places so the drought and its effects are no longer a concern! Again – give me strength.   

Love you thoughts!

Published: about 1 month ago by hobbsbarb.

Tags: , , , ,

4 comments

Comments

  • What is "rural"?

    Barb, I think insofar as government policy, there ought to be some real benchmarks along the lines of “isolated” and “under-resourced” because as you say, the perception of what is rural differs so much from person to person.

    For instance, population would sit alongside things like, distance from nearest university/major hospital, services like secondary schools, major transport corridoors, that kind of thing. You could put that in an equation alongside dependence on local industry, which is much more direct in rural areas.

    The other problem is of course when rural and regional Australia get lumped together, so that funding might go to a place like Bendigo which is in a semi-boom, and that might be seen as supporting “RARA” when in effect, people more in need are not getting that assistance.

    Published about 1 month ago by ladymarmalade

  • I agree

    I agree with the lines that ladymarmalade has taken. Your thoughts should be sent to the Federal Government so they can start thinking along these lines.

    For me as a laywoman when thinking about rural communities and regional Australia I think of it in these terms.

    A rural community is one that has a small population has only one or none of essential services ie: doctor, hospital, dentist, fire service, police station, schoool etc.

    A regional community is basically any area outside of the big cities. they may be reliant on tourism or a primary industry.

    Published about 1 month ago by Carolyn

  • To Regionalise, or not to .....

    I think Carolyn’s comments are right but that is not the way politicians draw the line. they seem disconnected from regional and rural reality. I used to say we should welcome foreigners who wanted to relocate to Australia as long as they are prepared to work in rural areas for at least 5 years to assimilate and contribute. Naive, yes, but I now realise the error of my ways. We should be sending the politicians out to work in regional and rural areas before they are entitled to speak on behalf of the 7.2 million Australians they assume they understand sufficiently to represent…

    Published about 1 month ago by kohorn

  • Rural anecdote

    A couple of years ago, when I was naive enough to think that the phones landline may be fixed well enough to make my internet speed increase from 16mbps to say about 50mbps, so that I could avoid buying a satellite, I had some long correspondence with Telstra and CC to my local politicians. A senator who is from rural – real rural area in WA took my letter to an appropriate politician in the field of communication (I can guess but she was too polite to name him). “see what we have to put up with” she told him. He shrugged his shoulders and stated “Well if they don’t like it they don’t have to live there.” I got that story from the Senator in question – so you can see how angry she was!! So not all pollies are unaware of what is happening, but when they have to put up with fellow pollies who are as kohorn said are “assuming they understand”, what hope is there! Thanks for your comments – love more Hobbsbarb

    Published about 1 month ago by hobbsbarb

Please log-in | Forgot your password?

About Author

Kids_trees0007_medium

Barbara Hobbs

Copyright OurPatch 2007-2008 [0.8.5 M0]